Archive for the ‘Situations’ category

Kanye Goes Hard…. And I’m Rolling With Him…

September 14th, 2009

Society has these imaginary forces that constantly duel for dominance and continue to keep everything in motion – good vs. evil, right vs. wrong, etc.  The issue with these forces is that the vast majority of members of commercial societies participate actively while remaining relatively oblivious to the “gears and motors” that turn our world.

I had the opportunity to watch MTV’s Video Music Awards tonight with intentions of enjoying yet another tribute to Michael Jackson and watching another highly anticipated performance by my favorite artist, Jay Z.  Little did I know in the beginning that all of my intentions would be easily eclipsed by this:

I’m sure by now that it is common knowledge in the world of Pop that Kanye West interrupted Taylor Swift during her VMA acceptance speech to downplay her reception of the award and to acknowledge the artist that he truly felt deserved the award.  His actions were greeted by immediate disapproval in the form of “boos” and other jeers, character assassination via Facebook, Twiiter and many other social networking sites and ejection from the venue.  I must say that I agree Kanye’s timing was horrible and his actions seemed quite immature, but I couldn’t help but wonder why this elicited such the reaction that it received.

From birth, we are all socialized to become the people that we are and a part of that socialization includes the inherent learned knowledge of right vs wrong and good vs evil.  Whether from your family, schools, television or even the internet, these leanings take root as a part of our personality.  This then means that when an event like the one at VMA’s presents itself, it strikes a chord with our sense of morality and we instantaneously choose sides.  This does not come without consequence in that we begin to attack or judge the character of the person or idea that opposes our grasp of what is right.  So why is this an issue?

Let’s consider this.  In the midst of all of the name calling, and disgust in Kanye’s actions, did anyone take a moment to analyze why he felt the need to do what he did?  Did anyone consider the totality of the person that is Kanye West (the artist, unless you know him personally) and understand how this plays into the whole scenario?  Can we distinguish how he acted from his intentions?  A true follower of Kanye West fully understands that he is a very artistic, hip hop fundamentalist.  When I say this, I mean that he is a product of and a current driving force of the culture and it’s important to note that within the last few years, we have seen hip hop rise to dominance as an influence on pop culture.  Being a fundamentalist of the culture would then encourage a desire to see the art maintain its integrity and purity.

We also have to consider that MTV has one of the biggest influences on pop culture in America.  When MTV bestows an award on an individual or piece of work, this gesture has the power to subconsciously program millions of people and manipulate the destinies of many people.   So we now find a purveyor of his culture taking an inopportune moment to salvage what he felt should have been right in the eyes of the masses.  He didn’t seek to take the award from Taylor Swift, but he wanted to acknowledge that another video should recognized as one of most important videos of the century (thus far).  I’m not much of a Beyonce fan, but the “Single Ladies” video crossed so many lines and affected more people than many other videos in recent history.  It’s important to note here that past awards shows have seen Kanye express his disappointment for not winning awards that he thought he deserved (a few I’ve agreed with) and giving away awards that he thought he didn’t deserve (Outkast/UGK).

I’ve heard so many people call Kanye an “idiot” or a “nut” and talk about how wrong he was, but it seems that this only extends to what he did.  Did his opinion actually have merit?  I saw so many Twitter and Facebook updates that attacked and judged him, but there was no real discussion on the idea he established.  This all just reinforces my opinion that the masses in Pop culture tend to generally have no opinion of their own that can be soundly backed by logic and reason.  They tend to just sway with whatever the big machine (MTV, radio, etc) tells us is hot.  Many great artists never see great success because they can’t afford it (remember the recent radio payola lawsuits) or we collectively don’t demand anything different.  Kanye stood up for what he believed.  Kanye Goes Hard… And I’m Rolling With Him.

A Little “Monk-ey” Business??? Monks Brawl In Jerusalem

November 10th, 2008

So really, what is the world coming to when the monks start brawling.  Is it okay to fight religious leaders now?  I have some unfinished business with a couple of preachers….

The Front Page

November 7th, 2008

I found this collage of newspaper front pages on jedreport.com.  Enjoy!

Uncle Tom? Toby?… Let Phase II Now Begin

November 5th, 2008

I’m so very elated over the fact that Barack Obama was able to successfully and legally win the presidency of the United States of America.  But let’s get it straight, we have a lot of work to do.  It’s not over.  We have to do all that we can on local and individual levels to help change our world.  Phase II of the criticism and attacks have already begun.  Here’s video of fellow Democrat Ralph Nader calling Barack Obama an “Uncle Tom” and a “Toby” (from the movie Roots) on the night of his big win.  There could have been bitterness because of his lost, but at any rate, even John McCain was respectful in his defeat.

BARACK OBAMA – THE 44th PRESIDENT OF THE UNITES STATES

November 5th, 2008

Congratulations to the 44th President of the  United States of America: Barack Obama!!!!


The election is over now.  Let this guy be your model.

Get some rest!!!  I know I will!!!

Photo from Huffingtonpost.com

Are McCain Supporters Really Racisit? Or Just Ignorant?…

October 17th, 2008

Check out the vid below and tell me what you think.  We all know that this would be a huge media issue if any of the tables were turned.

Looks Like McCain 4.0 Is The Same As McCain Beta…

October 16th, 2008

Tired of the same old McCain stump speeches?  Well, guess what?  The new and improved McCain is…. well, old and recycled… See for yourself:

Ignorance Broadcasted Live From Ozark, Missouri – Bashes Barack Obama

October 11th, 2008

Okay, any press is good press?  Not necessarily.  A lot of cities I have never heard of before are getting major media love these days because of real life ignorance (I say real life, because this is the kind of crap you once only saw in the movies) related to the election.  First Wasilla, Alaska and now Ozark, Missouri.  Someone posted this ignorant sign embarrassing all of the people of Ozark:

As they say: “The party just don’t stop!”  I’m so ready for this election to end.  Well, maybe not… cause then I may not have anything to blog about.  LOL!  I hear all of you that say I’m too political as of late.  But hey, this is a very, very important election year and the BS just keeps getting better.  Who could ever script this kind of stuff???? :)

Comedy Central and the Economic Bailout….

September 24th, 2008

I don’t know if you guys have heard or not, but this issue on the economic bailout has gone from “The economy is fundamentally sound….” to “Let’s cancel the debate (that everyone has been looking forward to) so that we can hash out this economic plan…”.  Part of me wants to believe that this is just a political tactic to give the McCain – Palin ticket more time to prepare for the debate, or somewhat of a retaliation toward the media’s semi protest from earlier this week because they weren’t allowed in Palin’s first meetings with world leaders at the UN.  Also, this could be apart of the McCain’s plan to continue avoiding the media.

Anyways, on this issue of the bailout, notice how Comedy Central deals with it, quite hilarious:

The Colbert Report

The Daily Show

Obama and the Principles of Economic Bailout

September 22nd, 2008

Sean Combs once said “Don’t Talk About It, Be About It….”.  Barack Obama is doing just that.  On the campaign trail, Obama has been outlying principles that he believes should be included in the Economic Bailout plan.  An ABC news blog reports:

ABC’s Sunlen Miller reports: Since yesterday, Sen. Barack Obama has spoken on the phone with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Banking Committee chairman Chris Dodd, Rep. Barney Frank, Sen. Chuck Schumer, Rep. Ralph Emmanuel, former President Bill Clinton and Sen. Hillary Clinton about the economic situation and the plan for dealing with it.

Spokesperson Linda Douglass says that the conversations were about devising a “quick, bipartisan solution” to the economic crisis and they touched on the principles that Obama laid out in a speech in Charlotte, N.C., today.

As of now, the Bush administration has only offered a concept with a staggering price tag, not a plan,” Obama said. “Even if the U.S. Treasury recovers some or most of its investment over time, this initial outlay of up to $700 billion is sobering. And in return for their support, the American people must be assured that the deal reflects the basic principles of transparency, and fairness, and reform. We can’t allow this to happen again. They have run this government, they have run this economy into the ground. We’ve got to make sure that we lift if back up, but we’ve got to have some rules in place to make sure it doesn’t happen again.”

Obama set out seven principles (several of which he has regularly mentioned on the campaign trail) for what he would like to see included in the government’s bailout plan.

  • No blank check. If we grant the Treasury broad authority to address the immediate crisis, we must insist on independent accountability and oversight. Given the breach of trust we have seen and the magnitude of the taxpayer money involved, there can be no blank check.
  •  

  • Rescue requires mutual responsibility. As taxpayers are asked to take extraordinary steps to protect our financial system, it is only appropriate to expect those institutions that benefit to help protect American homeowners and the American economy. We cannot underwrite continued irresponsibility, where CEOs cash in and our regulators look the other way. We cannot abet and reward the unconscionable practices that triggered this crisis. We have to end them.
  •  

  • Taxpayers should be protected. This should not be a handout to Wall Street. It should be structured in a way that maximizes the ability of taxpayers to recoup their investment. Going forward, we need to make sure that the institutions that benefit from financial insurance also bear the cost of that insurance.
  •  

  • Help homeowners stay in their homes. This crisis started with homeowners and they bear the brunt of the nearly unprecedented collapse in housing prices. We cannot have a plan for Wall Street banks that does not help homeowners stay in their homes and help distressed communities.
  •  

  • A global response. As I said on Friday, this is a global financial crisis and it requires a global solution. The United States must lead, but we must also insist that other nations, who have a huge stake in the outcome, join us in helping to secure the financial markets.
  •  

  • Main Street, not just Wall Street. The American people need to know that we feel as great a sense of urgency about the emergency on Main Street as we do the emergency on Wall Street. That is why I call on Senator McCain, President Bush, Republicans and Democrats to join me in supporting an emergency economic plan for working families a plan that would help folks cope with rising gas and food prices, save one million jobs through rebuilding our schools and roads, help states and cities avoid painful budget cuts and tax increases, help homeowners stay in their homes, and provide retooling assistance to help ensure that the fuel-efficient cars of the future are built in America.
  •  

  • Build a regulatory structure for the 21st Century. While there is not time in a week to remake our regulatory structure to prevent abuses in the future, we should commit ourselves to the kind of reforms I have been advocating for several years. We need new rules of the road for the 21st Century economy, together with the means and willingness to enforce them.

 

 Sounds like a great plan to me.  It also sounds fair and beneficial.  What do you think??